Legal Opinion

Coffman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided September 3, 2002No. CIV.A. 2:00-1156PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, which the Court reinstated for consideration following the Order of July 29, 2002 and the parties’ ensuing supplemental briefing. After considering the parties’ submissions, supplemental materials, and the administrative record, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and DENIES Plaintiffs cross motion.

I. DISCUSSION

A. Factual and Procedural Background

1. The Employment Relationship

Plaintiff Frank H. Coffman, II, is fifty-three years old. He was formerly a valued…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. George W. Mitchell v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. Ellen v. Ellis v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  5. Brenda Elliott v. Sara Lee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hufford v. Harris Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2004
  2. Pettaway v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. Fick v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
  4. C. BRATTON v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2006
  5. Smith v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API