Legal Opinion
Smith v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 4, 2003No. CIV. WDQ-02-3049PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
QUARLES, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Neal S. Smith (“Mr. Smith”), has sued the defendant, Continental Casualty Company (“Continental Casualty”), for wrongful denial of his claim for long-term disability benefits, pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. Mr. Smith seeks payment of back benefits together with interest, future benefits, reinstatement of his term life insurance under a group policy issued to his employer, J.J. Haines and Company (“J.J. Haines”), “waiver of premium” coverage under that policy, and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Charles M. Laws v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hufford v. Harris Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2004
- Smith v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003