Legal Opinion

People v. Santos

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 1966No. Crim. 2422PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P. J.

J.Defendant and another were tried jointly for burglary (Pen. Code, § 459) and grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. 1). One attorney had been appointed to represent both defendants and did so throughout the prosecution of the People’s case. The evidence was that a house in San Diego County had been burglarized; some of the things taken were a .22 pistol, camera, two watches, tape recorder and two radios. The lady living there thought she had talked to defendant several days before the burglary; she identified him as having come to her home to inquire if she subscribed to a local newspaper.

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moore v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In Re JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. People v. LindenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. KranhouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. CummingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. KellettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. People v. WittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API