People v. Cummings
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtChristian, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of felony, robbery in the first degree. (Pen. Code, § 211.) Appellant appeared without counsel at his arraignment in the municipal court, at the preliminary hearing, and at the ensuing jury trial in the superior court. He now contends that he did not intelligently waive his right to counsel and that the trial court’s failure to procure certain material witnesses deprived him of due process of law. We have determined that appellant did not effectively waive his right to counsel; it is therefore unnecessary to consider his other contentions.
The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moore v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Rice v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. KranhouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- William Thomas Bryan v. Dr. L. J. Pope, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Aaron Hodge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Aaron Hodge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.