Legal Opinion

Phelps v. Aurora State Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 8, 1932No. 28,810PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to recover $2,604.33 on a count for money liad and received. The trial court submitted to the jury two questions arising upon the issues made. They were found favorably to the plaintiffs and if given effect would permit a recovery of $777.37. Afterwards the court vacated the findings and directed judgment for the defendant. The plaintiffs appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial.

Our holdings are that a material promise, to be performed in the future, made with intent to defraud, the maker intending at the time not to keep it, constitutes actionable fraud. Smith v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maguire v. MaguireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Stevenson v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hansen v. Daniel Hayes Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Holmes v. WilkesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Smith v. VosikaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ridley v. KroutWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  2. McCreight v. Davey Tree Expert Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. McDonald v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1982
  4. Hackenjos v. Kemper Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. Bernstein v. LevitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API