Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Daniel Hayes Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 26, 1922No. 22,684PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover $11,200 and interest, the amount paid by him as the purchase price of California land bought from the Daniel Hayes Company, a corporation. The corporation made no answer. Defendant Willey answered and the issues were tried. Plaintiff had a verdict and defendant Willey appeals.

The complaint alleged that the defendants fraudulently represented that the corporation owned several thousand acres of land in California known as the Bliss ranch; that all of said lands were productive and rich agricultural lands, smooth and level, improved and plowed and sown…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Busterud v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Nelson v. BerknerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. Edward Thompson Co. v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Albitz v. Minneapolis & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. General Electric Co. v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ganley Brothers, Inc. v. Butler Brothers Bldg. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Bradley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  3. Maguire v. MaguireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Guy T. Bisbee Co. v. Granite City Investing Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Tischer v. BardinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API