McDonald v. Johnson & Johnson

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION

II. EVIDENCE

III. THE DEFENDANT’S CLAIMED BASES OF RELIEF

IV. DISCUSSION

A. PLAINTIFFS’ STANDING TO RECOVER FOR ANTITRUST VIOLATIONS

B. THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL APPLICATION OF THE SHERMAN ACT

■ C. THE SHERMAN ACT CLAIMS

1. Section 1(a) Sufficiency of the Evidence to Establish a Suppression of the TENS Industry(b) Concerted Action(c) Sherman Act § 1 Per Se Charge to the Jury

2. Section 2(a) Specific Intent(b) Dangerous Probability of Success

D. THE CLAIM OF INCONSISTENT VERDICTS

E. THE CONTRACT CLAIM

F. THE FRAUD CLAIM

G. EVIDENTIARY RULINGS

H. DAMAGES

1. TENS Sales for Acute…