Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Levitz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 15, 1944No. 33,830PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

This case comes here on appeal by plaintiff from an order denying a new trial after direction of a verdict for defendants Levitz and Bearman, the case having been dismissed as to Delia Bearman. The action was for damages for alleged fraud in luring plaintiff into a pretended partnership arrangement to operate a furniture business and thus to gain the advantage of his skill, experience, and acquaintanceship in order to establish a profitable business, and then to separate plaintiff from the organization. The complaint alleged that defendants maliciously conspired to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Albitz v. Minneapolis & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Maguire v. MaguireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Cannon Falls Holding Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Phelps v. Aurora State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. McDermott v. RalichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wojtkowski v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Bernstein v. LevitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API