Bernstein v. Levitz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Chief Justice.
This case comes here on appeal by plaintiff from an order denying a new trial after direction of a verdict for defendants Levitz and Bearman, the case having been dismissed as to Delia Bearman. The action was for damages for alleged fraud in luring plaintiff into a pretended partnership arrangement to operate a furniture business and thus to gain the advantage of his skill, experience, and acquaintanceship in order to establish a profitable business, and then to separate plaintiff from the organization. The complaint alleged that defendants maliciously conspired to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Albitz v. Minneapolis & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Maguire v. MaguireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Cannon Falls Holding Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Phelps v. Aurora State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- McDermott v. RalichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wojtkowski v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Bernstein v. LevitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946