Harpole v. Paeschke Farms, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C. J.
This is an action to recover damages alleged to have been caused to a erop growing on plaintiffs’ land. Plaintiffs allege that defendant applied a chemical *594spray to brush and weeds on its property in such a manner as to cause drops of chemical spray and vapors to fall on plaintiffs’ land, resulting in damage to plaintiffs’ crop of pole beans. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant and plaintiffs appeal.
Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a series of photographs on the ground that they were not authenticated or verified and in permitting…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. McDanielOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Wulff v. Sprouse-Reitz Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State Highway Commission v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Blue v. City of UnionOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Farmers' National Bank v. WoodellOregon Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mulley v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
- Streight v. ConroyOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. StringerOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Valley InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.