Legal Opinion

Wulff v. Sprouse-Reitz Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1972PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

This is an action at law by the owners of a house and personal property and the insurance company which insured the property, to recover damages against the defendants Northern Electric Co., a corporation, and Sprouse-Reitz Co., Inc., a corporation, the manufacturer and retailer, respectively, of an electric blanket which allegedly caused a fire and destroyed the owners’ property.

The complaint sets forth two counts: that defendants were strictly liable for the manufacture and sale to plaintiffs Wulff of said blanket in a defective condition; that defendant Northern Electric was negligent in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Heaton v. Ford Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State Ex Rel. Dooley v. ConnallOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. NortinOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  4. State Highway Commission v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Johnson v. KolovosOregon Supreme Court · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. LyonsOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Myers v. Cessna Aircraft CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Cornell Drilling Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API