Legal Opinion

Goebel v. Vaught

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

The ruling of the court on the demurrer to defendant’s further and separate answer is not questioned in the argument or brief so that assignment of error will receive no further consideration.

The question propounded to defendant and objected to by plaintiff is as follows: “Now as to the collision,—you may state whether at that time you were expecting any collision.” The question was objected to because it called for a conclusion of the witness. It was answered, however, before the objection was made. The plaintiff moved to strike out the answer and that motion was allowed. During the progress…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Murphy v. HawthorneOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Cleary v. EckartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Marsh v. AyersMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Noble v. SearsOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Ross v. Willamette Valley Transfer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Willoughby v. DriscollOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. French v. TebbenIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Davis v. UnderdahlOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Nicholas v. FennellOregon Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API