Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Ayers

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1927No. 6,197PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

Early in the present year Harold Marsh, of the age of seventeen years, by guardian ad litem, commenced action against Stacey E. Ayers for damages for personal injuries sustained on January 6, 1927, when a motorcycle on which he was riding collided with a motor-truck driven by Ayers. Issue was joined and the cause tried in the district court of Silver Bow county; each side having introduced testimony and rested, the defendant moved the court to instruct the jury to return a verdict in his favor; the motion was denied, and the cause submitted to the jury. The trial resulted in verdict and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Casey v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Mullery v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Daniels v. Granite Bi-Metallic Con. Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. McIntyre v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Mehler v. DoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Fulton v. Chouteau County Farmers' Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Autio v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Kudrna v. Comet Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Boepple v. MohaltMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Marinkovich v. TierneyMontana Supreme Court · 1932

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API