Legal Opinion

Davis v. Underdahl

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1932PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, C. J.

At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case in chief, defendant moved for an order of dismissal and nonsuit against the plaintiff, which the court refused to grant, and at the conclusion of all of the testimony defendant moved for a directed verdict in his favor, which the court also refused to grant, to which rulings exceptions were allowed.

Defendant contends that the court erred in refusing to grant defendant’s motions for an order of nonsuit and for a directed verdict in favor of defendant upon the ground that the testimony conclusively showed that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Judson v. Bee Hive Auto Service Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  2. McDonough v. VozzelaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Sieber v. Russ Bros. Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Dierks v. NewsomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Olds v. HinesOregon Supreme Court · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Graham v. WristonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Smith v. Pacific Truck ExpressOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Bunnell v. PareliusOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Murray E. Gildersleeve Logging Co. v. Northern Timber Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API