Noble v. Sears
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
Defendant assigns six grounds of error in his appeal. The first three are treated together in defendant’s brief and will be disposed of in the same order in this opinion. The three assignments are that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for defendant; in submitting the case to the jury, and in entering a judgment for plaintiff on the verdict. The bill of exceptions clearly discloses evidence tending to prove negligence on the part of defendant. Not only the plaintiff and her husband but a disinterested witness, who saw the defendant’s car approach and enter the intersection,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hoag v. Washington-Oregon Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Mount v. WelshOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Johnson v. UnderwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Ramp v. OsborneOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- American Surety Co. of New York v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
3Cited by18 opinions
- Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Tuite v. UNION PACIFIC STAGESOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Sullivan v. Mountain States Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Prauss v. AdamskiOregon Supreme Court · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.