Cleary v. Eckart
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.
The question first presented is whether the evidence justifies the finding of the jury that the defendant was negligent in the management and operation of the car. Should that question be answered in the negative, it will be unnecessary to consider whether the court was justified in changing the answer of the jury to the question relating to contributory negligence.
There is no claim made that the defendant drove at an excessive rate of speed or that she was inattentive in any *116manner to her duties in the matter of driving the car. It is not claimed that she was reckless in any respect. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Greenfield v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Beard v. KlusmeierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Mitchell v. RaymondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Patnode v. FooteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- O'Shea v. LavoyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- McConville v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Higgins v. MasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Barger v. ChelponSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Sommerfield v. FluryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Bogen v. . BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.