Soderstrom v. Premo
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, P. J.
Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief. The petition alleged three claims for relief: (1) petitioner’s convictions were secured in violation of his state and federal constitutional rights to the adequate and effective assistance of counsel (Claim 1); (2) petitioner’s convictions were secured in violation of his state and federal constitutional rights to the adequate and effective assistance of appellate counsel (Claim 2); and (3) petitioner’s convictions were secured in violation of his right to due process, in that the prosecutor failed to disclose…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Datt v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Pratt v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Asbill v. AngelozziCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Dudrov v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Gonzales v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Fisher v. AngelozziCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Himebaugh v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.