Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Angelozzi

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 17, 2017No. 11CV0050; A154576PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Petitioner sought post-conviction relief with respect to several convictions entered after a guilty plea. In his petition, he raised several claims that he was denied his right to adequate and effective assistance of trial and appellate counsel under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution,, and the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.1 He also brought a claim that the state’s failure to disclose an exculpatory police report violated his federal due process rights as recognized by Brady v. Maryland, 373 US 83, 83 S Ct 1194, 10 L Ed 2d 215 (1963). At the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Behrle v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Morris v. KanneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Aguilar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API