Gonzales v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.
Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief. The petition alleged three claims for relief: (1) that petitioner’s trial counsel was constitutionally inadequate and ineffective (Claim 1); (2) that petitioner’s appellate counsel was inadequate and ineffective (Claim 2); and (3) that errors by the trial court warranted post-conviction relief (Claim 3). Petitioner assigns error to the trial court’s denial of relief on Claim 1 and Claim 2. He also assigns error to the post-conviction court’s failure to enter judgment in the form required by ORS 138.640 (l),1…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Datt v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Soderstrom v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Dudrov v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Myers v. BrockampCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dudrov v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Fisher v. AngelozziCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Himebaugh v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Kulhavy v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017