Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Soltweddle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1888No. 13,037PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Lake Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Soltweddle sued the railway company in ejectment to recover possession of real estate, and also to recover damages for injuries occasioned by the construction and operation of the company’s railroad over the plaintiff’s land. The action was commenced on the 27th day of March, 1885, and such proceedings were had as that, on the 25th day of May, 1885, judgment was rendered in the Lake Circuit Court in favor of the plaintiff. The court made an order directing that a writ issue to the sheriff of Lake county, commanding him to put the railway company out, and put the plaintiff into possession of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. CliffordIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Sherlock v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Midland Railway Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. NyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kincaid v. Indianapolis Natural Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Strickler v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Morgan v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Chicago & Indiana Coal Railway Co. v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API