Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. Clifford

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1888No. 12,461PublishedCited by 33 opinions

From the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellee in his complaint asserts a right to the possession of one hundred and twenty acres of land, and avers that the appellant has possession of it without *462right. The complaint seeks possession of the land, and not compensation, except in so far as damages are an incident of the right of possession. The action must, therefore, be treated as purely a possessory one, and on that theory we must examine and decide all the questions presented by the record.

The second paragraph of the answer of the appellant alleges that, on the 11th day of February, 1848, the General Assembly passed an act…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Spring Valley Water Works v. SchottlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. RowanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Rice v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. SwinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. CreekIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. City of Terre Haute v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Kirkpatrick v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. TrowbridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API