Legal Opinion

Strickler v. Midland Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1890No. 14,470PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

— This is an action by the appellant against the appellee for damages to appellant’s lot by reason of the appropriation of a street in front of such lot for railroad purposes. Appellee filed an answer, to which, the appellant demurred, and the demurrer was overruled, and appellant excepted, and filed a reply. The cause was submitted to the court for trial, and on proper request the court found the facts and stated its conclusions of law, and the appellant excepted to the conclusions of law.

Errors are assigned as to the ruling of the court on the demurrer to appellee’s answer and on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SoltweddleIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Williams v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Blackwell, Enid & Southwestern Railway Co. v. BeboutSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SimpsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Morgan v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Seven Lakes Reservoir Co. v. MajorsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API