Legal Opinion

Midland Railway Co. v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1888No. 13,063PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

This suit was commenced by Samuel M. Smith to enjoin the appellant, the Midland Railway Company, and the other defendants, who are alleged to be the managers and contractors engaged in constructing the appellant company’s line of railway, from continuing the work of constructing the railroad over the plaintiff’s lands until due compensation shall have been made for the land so to be taken and occupied.

The complaint alleged that the railway company, through its managers and contractors, had unlawfully entered upon the plaintiff’s lands, and that they were engaged in digging and excavating the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. City of Logansport v. UhlIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. SwinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. KinseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Buchanan v. Logansport, Crawfordsville & Southwestern R. W. Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Messick v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Kincaid v. Indianapolis Natural Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Sherlock v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Porter v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Clark v. Cambridge & Arapahoe Irrigation & Improvement Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API