Legal Opinion
Super Power Supply, Inc. v. Macase Industrial Corp.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 11, 1994No. CV 93-6781 WJR (Sx)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
REA, District Judge.
On December 16, 1993, the Court conducted a hearing on plaintiff Super Power Supply, Inc.’s (“Super Power”) application for a preliminary injunction. At that time, the Court denied the application and indicated to the parties that it was gravely concerned with the behavior of Super Power’s counsel, Peter S. Hwu of the Law Offices of Peter S. Hwu, in connection with Super Power’s applications for temporary restraining orders and the preliminary injunction, and invited counsel for defendant Macase Industrial Corp. (“Macase-Taiwan” or “Macase”) to file a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Truesdell v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
- ADO FINANCE, AG v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1996
- Persyn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Truesdell v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Truesdell v. SOUTHERN CAL. PERM. MED. GROUPDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2001