Legal Opinion
Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 28, 1975No. Nos. 74-1355, 74-2034PublishedCited by 1,068 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BARNES and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and SKOPIL,* District Judge. SKOPIL, District Judge:
Attorney Richard A. Perkins represented Ed Kerr, a union member, in four related actions brought against the Screen Extras Guild, Inc. and certain of *69its officers for activities prohibited by the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (LMRDA), 29 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. The first two actions were eventually resolved in favor of Kerr. Kerr v. Shanks, 466 F.2d 1271 (9th Cir. 1972). On remand to the district court, Perkins was awarded attorney’s fees of $20,000 for his efforts in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kenneth j.yablonski and Joseph A. Yablonski v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Ed Kerr, for and on Behalf of Himself and All Other Members of Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Labor Organization v. H. O'Neil ShanksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Ed Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
3Cited by1,068 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Trevino v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
1,063 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.