Legal Opinion

Persyn v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 1, 1996No. 91-1535LPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

This Order arises out of an Order of Sanctions filed by the court on June 3, 1996, holding plaintiffs’ counsel, Mr. Craig L. Austin, liable for sanctions under RCFC 11 and the court’s inherent powers. Persyn v. United States, 35 Fed.Cl. 708 (1996) (“Persyn-Sanctions ”). This Order renders and quantifies sanctions against Austin based on defendant’s certified statement, filed July 3, 1996, of charges for all expenses, costs, and attorney’s fees directly attributable to the defense of the government’s position against the areas addressed by the June 3, 1996…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Applegate v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  2. Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API