Legal Opinion
Truesdell v. SOUTHERN CAL. PERM. MED. GROUP
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 20, 2001No. CV 01-02337 ABC (BQRX)Published
1Opinion of the Court
151 F.Supp.2d 1174 (2001)
Dyan A. TRUESDELL, Plaintiff,
v.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP; and the Hospital and Service Employees International Union, Local 399, Defendants.
No. CV 01-02337 ABC (BQRX).
United States District Court, C.D. California.
June 20, 2001.
Jerome Zamos, Jerome Zamos Law Offices, Woodland Hills, CA, for Plaintiff.
F. Scott Page, Thomas R. Kaufman, Seyfarth Shaw, Los Angeles, CA, James G. Varga, Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. PRO. 11 & 28 U.S.C. § 1927
CO…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.