Legal Opinion
Truesdell v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 24, 2002No. CV. 01-02337 ABCPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. PRO. 11 & 28 U.S.C. § 1927
COLLINS, District Judge.
On June 20, 2001, the Court signed an Order imposing sanctions against Plaintiffs counsel. On June 20, 2002, the Ninth Circuit vacated the sanctions award and remanded for reconsideration in light of the Circuit’s decision in Christian v. Mattel, Inc., 286 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir.2002).
In Christian, the Circuit held that sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 may not be imposed for “[c]onduct in depositions, discovery meetings of counsel, oral representations at…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cincinnati Insurance v. Dynamic Development Group, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Robinson v. Lawrence (In re Lawrence)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Advanced Hair Restoration LLC v. Bosley IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP v. Central Coast Agriculture IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Christina Gonzalez v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.