State v. Christi
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Judge.
The issue raised in this appeal is whether A.R.S. § 13-3214(B), which allows municipalities to regulate prostitution, is constitutionally infirm as either a “local or special law” or a denial of equal protection.
The defendant, Gaye Colleen Christi, was charged with two counts of prostitution, in violation of Scottsdale Revised Code, § 7-304(B)(1). After a trial to the court, she was found guilty of one count of prostitu tion. On June 21, 1984, the defendant was sentenced to the mandatory minimum sentence of 10 days in jail, pursuant to the Scottsdale ordinance. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- State of Oregon v. PirkeyOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's FoundationArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Ex Parte CarsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Luhrs v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fund Manager v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Babe's Cabaret v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- IKON Office Solutions, Inc. v. CrookCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000