Legal Opinion

Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 11, 1995No. 1 CA-CV 93-0580PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOYES, Presiding Judge.

Since 1986, Appellee Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Company (“Colonial”) has sold insurance to state employees via pre-tax payroll deduction without having to compete for and be awarded a contract from Appellants (“the State”), as required of other insurance companies. In 1993, when the State sought to terminate this privilege, Colonial filed a special action in superior court seeking a judgment declaring that Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 38-612(B) (Supp. 1994) exempts it from the requirements imposed by the State on other insurance companies, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DeddensArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Dupnik v. MacDougallArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Barry v. AlbertyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Begay v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. State v. ChristiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mobile Community Council for Progress, Inc. v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. Stambaugh v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. Figueroa v. Delphi AcropolisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Stambaugh v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. Stambaugh v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API