Legal Opinion

State v. Hanson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 9, 1995No. C1-95-531, C5-95-564PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

These consolidated appeals raise the legal issue of the application of the Double Jeopardy Clause to an implied consent driver’s li*600cense revocation. Each arises from a DWI prosecution in which the defendant moved to dismiss, claiming the prior implied consent revocation was “punishment” barring further punishment. In the Hanson ease (Cl-95-531), the trial court denied the motion but certified the question to this court. In the Burns ease (C5-95-564), the trial court granted the motion to dismiss. Although the court certified the question, the state has chosen to appeal.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. KennedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. McClendonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. McClendonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. HickamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. State v. MayoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API