Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. McClendon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1997No. 63066-6PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

935 P.2d 1334 (1997)

131 Wash.2d 853

The STATE of Washington, Petitioner,

v.

Doy Lee McCLENDON, Gil Crosby, Sally Parrish, Frank Sayre, Richard Triquart, Stephen Stark, Brian Hayton and Mark Booth, Respondents.

No. 63066-6.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued January 18, 1996.

Decided May 1, 1997.

Russell Hauge, Kitsap County Prosecutor, Jeffrey Jahns, Deputy, Pamela Loginsky, Deputy, Port Orchard, Christine Gregoire, Attorney General, James Schmid, Asst. Attorney General, Seattle, amicus curiae on behalf of Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys and Department of Licensing.

James…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Densley v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. ShultzWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. TKWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. ShultzWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. T.K.Washington Supreme Court · 1999

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API