Legal Opinion

State v. Hickam

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 26, 1995No. 15256PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

The sole issue in this appeal taken by the state1 is whether the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment to the United States constitution prohibited the criminal prosecution of the defendant, Wendy R. Hickam, for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a (a),2 after her motor vehicle operator’s license had been suspended pursuant to General Statutes § 14-227b3 for the same conduct. The state *616appealed from the judgment of the trial court dismissing the criminal charges against the defendant on double jeopardy…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Tharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. State v. McClendonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. McClendonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Allen v. Attorney General of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  5. State v. MayoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API