Legal Opinion
State v. Mayo
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided February 20, 1996No. 78298, 78335PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIMBAUGH, Judge.
In these two cases, consolidated on the Court’s own motion, the State appeals the dismissal of its criminal prosecution against respondent Kenneth Mayo for driving while intoxicated, and the Director of Revenue (Director), having suspended Mary Becker’s driving privileges, appeals an order reinstating those privileges. The trial court in both cases ruled that the proceedings violated the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. We now reverse and remand both cases.
The facts of these eases are not in dispute and need only to be stated briefly.
On September 16, 1994,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Riche v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- State v. McClendonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BurnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. MullenixMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.