Legal Opinion
Laurel Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City Council
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 3, 1978No. Civ. 52606PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COBEY, Acting P. J.
Petitioners, Laurel Hills Homeowners Association, Briarcliff Improvement Association, Susan Tyler, and Marvin E. Jacobs, appeal from a judgment denying their petition for a writ of mandate that would have required respondents, the City Council of Los Angeles, the city planning commission and the city advisory agency, to vacate their approvals of a subdivision (tentative tract 29033) proposed by the developer, 8941 Mulholland Drive Corporation, and extensively modified by the city as a condition of approval. The city has cross-appealed. Both the appeal and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Lotts v. Board of Park CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- San Francisco Ecology Center v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of HanfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Mira Mar Mobile Community v. City of OceansideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Rio Vista Farm Bureau Center v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Citizens for Quality Growth v. City of Mt. ShastaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.