Legal Opinion
Citizens for Quality Growth v. City of Mt. Shasta
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 8, 1988No. C000810PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARR, J.
In this action plaintiffs, an unincorporated nonprofit association composed of landowners, taxpayers and residents in and around Mt. Shasta, and one individual, challenge the actions of the City Council of Mt. Shasta (City) in the reclassification of a 3 5-acre parcel of land located within the City. After City amended its general plan and rezoned this tract of land, plaintiffs filed a petition for mandate, seeking an order compelling City to set aside its actions for failure to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.).…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Bozung v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- County of Inyo v. YortyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Resource Defense Fund v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Federation of Hillside & Canyon Associations v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of HanfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.