Legal Opinion
Mira Mar Mobile Community v. City of Oceanside
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 13, 2004No. D042070PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McINTYRE, J.
In this action brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.), Mira Mar Mobile Community (Mira Mar) and Logan Boggs (together plaintiffs) appeal a judgment denying their petition for writ of mandate challenging the certification of an environmental impact report (FIR) for a proposed development project known as the Renaissance Terrace Condominiums (the project). (All undesignated statutory references are to the Public Resources Code.)
Plaintiffs contend that the decision by the Oceanside Community Development Commission…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Gentry v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- The Pocket Protectors v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Banker's Hill, Hillcrest, Park West Community Preservation Group v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Eureka Citizens for Responsible Government v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Marin Municipal Water District Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.