Legal Opinion

Harris Et Ux. v. Arthur

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 23, 1912No. 2277PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Action by F. O. Harris and Z. D. Harris, his wife, against W. J. Arthur. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

The plaintiffs in error, as plaintiffs below, instituted this suit on January 17, 1910, in the district court of Oklahoma county by original petition. After a demurrer had been sustained thereto and an amended petition filed, a general demurrer to the amended petition was again sustained by the court, to which action plaintiffs excepted, refused to plead further, and bring this case here on transcript for a review of the action of the trial court in sustaining the demurrer. The petition alleges, in substance, that the plaintiff Z. D. Harris was in possession of and holding…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Williams v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Halsell v. Renfrow and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  4. Halsell v. RenfrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  5. Logan v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Woodworth v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Sperling v. MarlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Levy v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Sarber v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Jennings v. New York Petroleum Royalty Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API