Grant v. Milam
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Okla. T. Error from District Court, Pawnee County; before, Bayard T. Earner, Judge. Actio,n on contract for sale of goods by J. H. Milam against T. M. Grant and Frank Hudson. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. November 24, 1903, J. H. Milam, who will hereafter be denominated “plaintiff,” filed his petition in the district court of Pawnee county, Okla.
Read the full summary
Okla. T. Error from District Court, Pawnee County; before, Bayard T. Earner, Judge. Actio,n on contract for sale of goods by J. H. Milam against T. M. Grant and Frank Hudson. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. November 24, 1903, J. H. Milam, who will hereafter be denominated “plaintiff,” filed his petition in the district court of Pawnee county, Okla. T., against T. M. Grant and Frank Hudson, individually and as partners in which it was alleged that in the month of July, 1903, they entered into a verbal contract whereby plaintiff agreed to sell, and defendants agreed to buy,…
1Opinion of the Court
DüNN, J.
(after stating the facts as above). The plaintiff in this case pleads that be sold and delivered, and that defendants accepted from him under a parol, contract, a certain quantity of corn. The defendants filed, as answer, simply a general denial. These pleadings made the issue which was submitted to a jury. Evidence was offered by both parties, and is conflicting in the extreme.
The plaintiff and his witnesses testified that he was a farmer living near the town of Skedee, Oída. T., and having a quantity of com, something in excess of 10,000 bushels, which he desired to, sell, he met…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. HinesIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
- Stone v. . BrowningNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MarksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- Jones v. Mechanics BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Barnsdall State Bank v. DykesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1928
- Chickasaw Compress Co. v. BowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Tulsa St. Ry. Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Harris Et Ux. v. ArthurSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.