Legal Opinion

Chisholm v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 2015No. 201500991PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Rodney Chisholm, convicted of murder in 2011, appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief requesting a new trial, arguing the district court erred in denying his application. He claims his counsel was ineffective and argues the district court erred in failing to address all of the issues he raised post-conviction. We conclude the district court’s decision to deny Chisholm post-conviction relief was supported by the evidence, and we affirm the district court’s order.

I

[¶ 2] In 2011, Chisholm was convicted of the murder of his '…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Roth v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Chisholm v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Curtiss v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Everett v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Chisholm v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Patterson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Ratliff v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API