Curtiss v. State

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Spencer Curtiss appeals from a district-court order denying his request for relief from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for recdnsideration. He argues (1) the court erred when it did not consider the criminal trial transcript while ruling on his application for post-conviction relief, and (2) the court erred when it ruled on his motion for reconsideration before he was given: an opportunity to respond to the State’s answer. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Curtiss was charged ■ with gross sexual imposition.-…