Chisholm v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Rodney Chisholm appealed from a district court order dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. Chisholm argues the court erred in summarily dismissing his application on its own motion without providing him with notice or an opportunity to be heard. He also claims the court erred in failing to rule on every issue raised in his application. We reverse and remand, concluding the court erred in summarily dismissing the application.
I
[¶ 2] In 2011, a jury found Chisholm guilty of murder. Chisholm appealed, and his conviction was affirmed. State v.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. BenderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Berlin v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Lindsey v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Atkins v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Bridges v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Davies v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Greywind v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.