Legal Opinion

Romagnolo v. Romagnolo

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1964No. Civ. 21454PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.

The problem in this case is whether a judgment deciding that certain real property held in the form of joint tenancy was converted to partnership property, can be supported by the evidence and by the law. Appellant, Vera Romagnolo, claims the entire property as the last living person of a trio of joint tenants. Margherita Romagnolo, respondent, claims one-half of the property as legatee under the will of Giovanni Battista Romagnolo, known as Bob Romagnolo, and claims that Bob Romagnolo’s one-half interest resulted from the formation of a partnership between him and appellant’s now deceased…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wrightson v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Perelli-Minetti v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Swarthout v. GentryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Bumb v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Pluth v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ferriter v. Estate of BlaneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Philbrick v. HuffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Apple v. KileIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Dimond v. KellyAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Cheung v. Cheung-Wick CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API