Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Batson

District Court, W.D. South Carolina

Decided August 22, 1945No. Civil Action 524PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYCHE, District Judge.

In this action the plaintiff seeks judgment against the defendant for treble damages under the provisions of the Emergency Price Control 'Act of 1942, as amended and extended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 901 et seq., and an injunction enjoining the defendant from violating the provisions of. the same. The cause is now before me upon motion of plaintiff for summary judgment under Rule 56, Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

The complaint alleges, in substance, that the defendant sold and delivered dressed hogs, or wholesale pork cuts, at a price higher…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Zimberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
  3. Pen-Ken Gas & Oil Corp. v. Warfield Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  4. Walsh v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
  5. Heinz v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bair v. Axiom Design, L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Batson v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
  3. Beasley v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1948
  4. Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973
  5. Southern Ry. Co. v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API