Legal Opinion
Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided July 18, 1973No. Civ. A. No. 20529-3PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER THAT CERTAIN FACTS QUALIFIEDLY DENIED OR ADMITTED BY PLAINTIFF BE TAKEN AS ADMITTED
WILLIAM H. BECKER, Chief Judge.
On September 5, 1972, plaintiff Ha-venfield Corporation, filed herein a complaint for damages against defendant H & R Block, Inc., alleging, in separate counts, that (1) plaintiff “acting as an intermediary, identified and presented to defendant and Consumer Communication Service Corporation (hereinafter ‘CCSC’). a business opportunity concerning defendant’s acquisition of CCSC, and in this regard plaintiff performed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Batson v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- Walsh v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Riordan v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Dulansky v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1950
- Adley Express Co. v. Highway Truck Drivers & Helpers, Local No. 107District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Asea, Inc. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a Corporation, and Harbor Belt Line, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United Coal Companies v. Powell Construction Company and Interstate Equipment Corporation and Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Poole v. Textron, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Tequila Centinela, S.A. de C.V. v. Bacardi & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Dubin v. E.F. Hutton Group Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.