Legal Opinion
Walsh v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 30, 1939No. 7653PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
This is a motion made by the defendant for the following relief:
“1. For summary judgment in favor of the defendant, dismissing the complaint upon the merits (under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure).
“2. In the alternative, that the Court, by examining the pleadings and evidence before it, and by interrogating counsel, shall ascertain what material facts exist without substantial controversy, and what material facts, if any, are actually and in good faith controverted, and that the Court make an order specifying the facts that appear without controversy,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Steinberg v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. KushmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Sparer v. Travelers Insurance of HartfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Manhattan Life Insurance v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Ginsburg v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Smyth v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Williams v. KriegerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Masten v. MastenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Beasley v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1948
- Thalheim v. EberheimDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.