Legal Opinion

Meacham v. Bear Valley Irrigation Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1904No. 19,654PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRISON, C.

Action for the recovery of real property in the county of San Bernardino.

A trial by jury of the issues in the above-entitled action was waived by the parties, and when the cause came on for trial the plaintiff’s counsel read the verified complaint and answer and called' a witness to the stand, who was duly sworn by the clerk, whereupon the court made the following order t “This cause having been called for trial and the pleadings read, and under the rule of court the parties were requested to deposit with the clerk each one half of the reporter’s per diem to abide the result of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foley v. FoleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Adams v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Stevens v. TrumanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. White v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Rassner v. Federal Collateral Society, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Walter Cabinet Co. v. RussellIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Modern Loan Co. v. Police CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. People v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API