Legal Opinion

Rassner v. Federal Collateral Society, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1941No. Docket No. 22, Calendar No. 41,542PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The only question involved here is whether Act No. 273, §§ 15, 16, Pub. Acts 1917 (2 Comp. Laws 1929, §§ 9698, 9699 [Stat. Ann. §§ 19.595, 19.596]), violate the due process clauses of the Federal (Constitution of the United States, (14th Am., § 1) and State (Michigan Constitution [1908], art. 2, § 16) Constitutions. These sections are as follows:

"SEC. 15. Whenever complaint shall be made by any person on oath to any magistrate in any city or village, authorized to issue warrants in criminal cases, that personal property belonging to such complainant has been without his consent pawned or…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Coe v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Ochoa v. Hernandez Y MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Dation v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Aft Michigan v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Judicial Attorneys Ass'n v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Council of Organizations & Others for Education About Parochiaid, Inc. v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Judicial Attorneys Ass'n v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API