Legal Opinion

Walter Cabinet Co. v. Russell

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1911PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Writ of Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Gemmill, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

The plaintiff in error sued the defendants in error in a case of the fourth class in the municipal court of Chicago upon an attachment bond. The appearances of the defendants were entered on December 2, 1910, and an extension of time for filing an affidavit of merits was granted to them. On December 9, without any leave of court, the defendant in error Russell filed a statement of set-óff and affidavit, but no order was then or afterward made in regard to the plaintiff’s affidavit.of merits of defense and no such affidavit of merits was filed by the plaintiff. The statement of set-off claimed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. People v. McBrideIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. McVeigh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Nielsen v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Gordon v. GordonIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. General Motors Corp. v. BuaIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Kurczaba v. PollockAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. Cummings-Landau Laundry MacHinery Co. v. KoplinIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People Ex Rel. Difanis v. FutiaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. Gillman v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1915

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API