Legal Opinion

Potter v. City of Kenosha

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1955PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.

The principal question confronting us upon this appeal is whether a legal duty devolved upon the city not to permit the performance of work in the trench by the contractor’s employees unless shoring as required in the safety order of the industrial commission had been provided.

The trench in which William B. Potter came to his death was not protected by bracing, shoring, or sloping of walls as required by Order 610 of the industrial commission’s General Orders on Tunnel, Caisson, and Trench Construction. Appellant contends that under provisions of secs. 101.01 to 101.09, inclusive, of the 1951…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Milwaukee Builders' & Traders' ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Neitzke v. Kraft-Phenix Dairies, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Heiden v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Umnus v. Wisconsin Public Service Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Criswell v. Seaman Body Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Rowley v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Tauscher v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Welker v. Kennecott Copper CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. King v. Shelby Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
  5. Johns v. New York Blower Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API