Mustas v. INLAND CONSTRUCTION, INC.

By this appeal the following issues are presented:(1) Whether Mustas was a trespasser as a matter of law.(2) Whether the negligence of Mustas was causal as a matter of law.(3) Whether the place respondent Mustas fell was a place of employment of Westinghouse.(4) Whether Inland is entitled to indemnity against either or both Westinghouse or Rosenberg.

*198( 5 ) Whether the damages awarded by the trial court were excessive, notwithstanding the reduction of the jury award..(1) Status of Mustas. The record shows the following circumstances surrounding the fall. On January 3, 1958, Harry Mustas, a…